Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Feature: "When to export" selector for auto-sync for NetSuite #51949

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Nov 14, 2024

Conversation

twilight2294
Copy link
Contributor

@twilight2294 twilight2294 commented Nov 4, 2024

Explanation of Change

Adding a new feature "When to export" selector for auto-sync for NetSuite

Fixed Issues

$ #51512
PROPOSAL: #51512 (comment)

Tests

Precondition: Workspace is connected to Netsuite Accounting method.

  1. Go to workspace > accounting
  2. Click on advanced
  3. Click on auto-sync
  4. Enable toggle if disabled
  5. Observe that new field when to export appears.
  6. Click on the option
  7. On the new selector page, select new option

Verify that: you are navigated back to the previous page

  1. Press back to go to advanced page.

Verify that: if we select CASH as option then the hint text below auto-sync option should be: Out-of-pocket expenses will export when paid and if we select ACCURAL as option then the hind text should be: Out-of-pocket expenses will export when final approved.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Precondition: Workspace is connected to Netsuite Accounting method.

  1. Go to workspace > accounting
  2. Click on advanced
  3. Click on auto-sync
  4. Enable toggle if disabled
  5. Observe that new field when to export appears.
  6. Click on the option
  7. On the new selector page, select new option

Verify that: you are navigated back to the previous page

  1. Press back to go to advanced page.

Verify that: if we select CASH as option then the hint text below auto-sync option should be: Out-of-pocket expenses will export when paid and if we select ACCURAL as option then the hind text should be: Out-of-pocket expenses will export when final approved.

QA Steps

Precondition: Workspace is connected to Netsuite Accounting method.

  1. Go to workspace > accounting
  2. Click on advanced
  3. Click on auto-sync
  4. Enable toggle if disabled
  5. Observe that new field when to export appears.
  6. Click on the option
  7. On the new selector page, select new option

Verify that: you are navigated back to the previous page

  1. Press back to go to advanced page.

Verify that: if we select CASH as option then the hint text below auto-sync option should be: Out-of-pocket expenses will export when paid and if we select ACCURAL as option then the hind text should be: Out-of-pocket expenses will export when final approved.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-11-06.at.10.46.28.AM.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2024-11-06.at.10.48.41.AM.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-11-06.at.10.59.51.AM.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-11-06.at.10.57.55.AM.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-11-06.at.9.54.47.AM.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-11-06.at.10.03.02.AM.mov

@@ -2871,6 +2872,18 @@ const translations = {
[CONST.NETSUITE_REPORTS_APPROVAL_LEVEL.REPORTS_APPROVED_BOTH]: 'Aprobado por supervisor y contabilidad',
},
},
accountingMethods: {
label: 'Cuándo Exportar',
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@aimane-chnaif can you please confirm these translations, I'm yet to be added in the open source channel

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@twilight2294 Here's updated copies:

English: (- added in out of pocket)

When to Export
Choose when to export the expenses:
Accrual
Cash
Out-of-pocket expenses will export when final approved
Out-of-pocket expenses will export when paid
Sync NetSuite and Expensify automatically, every day. Export finalized report in realtime

Spanish:

Cuándo Exportar
Elige cuándo exportar los gastos:
Devengo
Efectivo
Los gastos por cuenta propia se exportarán cuando estén aprobados definitivamente
Los gastos por cuenta propia se exportarán cuando estén pagados
Sincroniza NetSuite y Expensify automáticamente, todos los días. Exporta el informe finalizado en tiempo real.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the help, it's late here, I will update tomorrow


const selectExpenseReportApprovalLevel = useCallback(
(row: MenuListItem) => {
// if (row.value !== config?.syncOptions.exportReportsTo) {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Waiting for the API to be named, i will update this after that

@twilight2294 twilight2294 changed the title Add new page for auto-config New Feature: "When to export" selector for auto-sync for NetSuite Nov 4, 2024
@twilight2294 twilight2294 force-pushed the issuenewpage branch 2 times, most recently from 578bb81 to fc05e8f Compare November 5, 2024 12:19
@twilight2294
Copy link
Contributor Author

pushed, verified commit!

@rojiphil
Copy link
Contributor

rojiphil commented Nov 6, 2024

@twilight2294 Why is there a need to force-push here?
Step 15 of the guidelines here discourages us to force-push.

@rojiphil
Copy link
Contributor

rojiphil commented Nov 6, 2024

There are TS and Lint errors also. Please address them.
Also, how close are we for the PR to be made ready for review?

@twilight2294
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also, how close are we for the PR to be made ready for review?

I was waiting for the API info, I should have it ready for review today

@twilight2294
Copy link
Contributor Author

@twilight2294 Why is there a need to force-push here?
Step 15 of the guidelines here discourages us to force-push.

I somehow commited the code but it was in unverified status, so i had to update the GPG key and make the commit verified

@twilight2294 twilight2294 marked this pull request as ready for review November 6, 2024 04:23
@twilight2294 twilight2294 requested a review from a team as a code owner November 6, 2024 04:23
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from rojiphil November 6, 2024 04:23
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 6, 2024

@rojiphil Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team November 6, 2024 04:23
@rojiphil
Copy link
Contributor

rojiphil commented Nov 6, 2024

@twilight2294 I will review it in some time.
Meanwhile, can you please merge with the latest main? Thanks

@twilight2294
Copy link
Contributor Author

Done, thanks :)

@twilight2294
Copy link
Contributor Author

twilight2294 commented Nov 6, 2024

Also @rojiphil I am still not sure about this comment, for the very first time when we enable the toggle, we have to set the value of accountingMethod to CASH otherwise it will be undefined on the BE untill the user selectes it manually (We only set it to cash on the frontend if accountingMethod is undefined. we need BE changes for that (though it shouldn't block this PR)

Copy link
Contributor

@rojiphil rojiphil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@twilight2294 Thanks for the PR. I have left some review comments. Please have a look.

src/CONST.ts Outdated
NETSUITE_ACCOUNTING_METHODS: {
ACCRUAL: 'ACCRUAL',
CASH: 'CASH',
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please use the constants defined in Expensify Common though: Expensify/expensify-common#817

As mentioned in the OP of the issue mentioned above, let us make use of the consts from there.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@yuwenmemon do we want to use CONST from the common repo ? I think it's better to define it here in App repo, but let me know if there is a reason to use it from upstream

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As it is already defined in expensify-common, let us use it as we should only have a single source of truth.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@twilight2294 twilight2294 Nov 7, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rojiphil we already import a CONST in that same file, how do we import the new consts from the upstream repo ?
Screenshot 2024-11-08 at 12 50 14 AM

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we not use this?

import {CONST as COMMON_CONST} from 'expensify-common';

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh i was unaware of that updating now, thanks for the help

@rojiphil
Copy link
Contributor

rojiphil commented Nov 6, 2024

I am still not sure about this comment, for the very first time when we enable the toggle, we have to set the value of accountingMethod to CASH otherwise it will be undefined on the BE untill the user selectes it manually (We only set it to cash on the frontend if accountingMethod is undefined

I am not sure if I get the problem here. Let me explain as I understand and confirm.

When we enable auto sync for the very first time, we should show the accounting method as Cash because the accounting method is not present in BE and FE (in Onyx). It looks like the BE considers the accounting method as Cash if it is not set in BE. But once the user changes the accounting method to Accrual, the BE and FE will be in sync. From then on, the configured accounting method will be used.

Also, enabling or disabling the auto sync would not impact the configured accounting method; the method would remain the same.

@yuwenmemon @dannymcclain Is the above understanding correct?

@twilight2294
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sure, I will work on the feedback today 👍

@twilight2294
Copy link
Contributor Author

It looks like the BE considers the accounting method as Cash if it is not set in BE.

No it considers it as undefined, which is why i was saying to update the BE to set it to CASH on the first time the user enables the toggle

@twilight2294
Copy link
Contributor Author

@twilight2294 The changes look good. I have just one more comment left. Please have a look. Thanks.

Updated, thanks, can you test this now 😄

@rojiphil
Copy link
Contributor

rojiphil commented Nov 8, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

MacOS: Chrome / Safari
51949-web-safari-001.mp4
Android: Native
51949-android-native-001.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
51949-mweb-safari-001.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
51949-mweb-chrome-001.mp4
iOS: Native
51949-ios-native-001.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
51949-desktop-001.mp4

Copy link
Contributor

@rojiphil rojiphil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @twilight2294 for all the changes.

@yuwenmemon Changes LGTM and works well too.
Over to you for review. Thanks.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from yuwenmemon November 8, 2024 17:17
@rojiphil
Copy link
Contributor

rojiphil commented Nov 8, 2024

@twilight2294 Just found out an issue during offline testing as demonstrated in the test video below. Here, the auto sync status i.e. Enabled and Disabled should be grayed when changed. Similarly, on changing Cash and Accrual accounting method, the changes should be grayed. Please fix this too. Thanks.

@yuwenmemon Please hold review until this is integrated too.

51949-offline-issue.mp4

@twilight2294
Copy link
Contributor Author

I will fix this today/tomorrow for sure, thanks for pointing out

@twilight2294
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rojiphil what should be the behaviour on Advanced page when someone changes the accounting method? the hint text changes so should we gray out the content in this case to? the current behaviour is as follows:

Screen.Recording.2024-11-11.at.2.40.41.PM.mov

FYI it's a bit difficult to put the hint text in pending state on advanced page as the current implementation only allows 1 config value to be passed to the OfflineWithFeedback so we can either pass autoSyncConfig?.pendingFields or config?.pendingFields for a single menu item.

Comment on lines 264 to 267
pendingAction={settingsPendingAction(
item.subscribedSettings,
item.subscribedSettings?.includes(CONST.NETSUITE_CONFIG.AUTO_SYNC) ? autoSyncConfig?.pendingFields : config?.pendingFields,
)}
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Had to do this because we set the pendingFields for AUTO_SYNC in autoSyncConfig and not config, do let me know if you have more doubts about this implementation @rojiphil

@rojiphil
Copy link
Contributor

what should be the behaviour on Advanced page when someone changes the accounting method? the hint text changes so should we gray out the content in this case to? the current behaviour is as follows:

When the accounting method is changed, I think the greying out should propagate even to Auto sync and the parent Advanced. A similar pattern is seen in Workflows->Delay Submissions as demonstrated in video below i.e. when Submission frequency is changed, the greying propagates even to Delay Submissions.
Would this not address the greying of the hint text as well?

51949-greying-issue.mp4

@twilight2294
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, I will update shortly

@twilight2294
Copy link
Contributor Author

Working on the fix now

@twilight2294
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rojiphil can you test again, all should work good now!

Copy link
Contributor

@rojiphil rojiphil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @twilight2294 for the changes.

@yuwenmemon LGTM and works well in offline too.
All yours for review. Thanks

51949-web-safari-offline-001.mp4

Comment on lines +54 to +56
if (row.value !== config?.accountingMethod) {
Connections.updateNetSuiteAccountingMethod(policyID, row.value, config?.accountingMethod ?? COMMON_CONST.INTEGRATIONS.ACCOUNTING_METHOD.CASH);
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB: Add a comment here explaining why we're defaulting to CASH

@yuwenmemon
Copy link
Contributor

Tested as well, works great! Thanks!

@yuwenmemon yuwenmemon merged commit 7a00538 into Expensify:main Nov 14, 2024
17 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/yuwenmemon in version: 9.0.63-1 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄 success ✅
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄 failure ❌

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/chiragsalian in version: 9.0.63-3 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄 failure ❌
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄 failure ❌

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants